Changes to Florida’s Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Law

Changes to Florida’s Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Law

By Dean Xenick, Associate, Law Firm of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman    

This year the Florida Legislature made broad, sweeping changes to Florida's Personal Injury Protection (PIP) law, limiting benefits and coverage. 

PIP is a type of motor vehicle coverage that covers an insured’s medical expenses and lost wages, or can provide a death benefit in fatal incidents. PIP is referred to as "no-fault" coverage, because PIP benefits are paid without regard to who is at "fault" for the automobile accident. All Florida drivers are required to carry PIP coverage for themselves.   

The new changes to the PIP laws are important and failing to follow them could preclude you from receiving the full PIP benefits you are entitled to under your PIP insurance coverage.  Below is a list of just some of these changes and it is by no means an exhaustive list.  Although some changes to PIP are effective July 1, 2012, the majority of the revisions do not take effect until January 1, 2013.

1) When involved in an automobile accident, individuals seeking PIP medical benefits are required to receive initial services and medical care within 14 days after the motor vehicle accident.   Initial services and care are only reimbursable if “lawfully provided, supervised, ordered or prescribed by a licensed physician, licensed osteopathic physician, licensed chiropractic physician, licensed dentist, or must be rendered in a hospital, a facility that owns or is owned by a hospital, or a licensed emergency transportation and treatment provider. Follow up services and care requires a referral from such providers and must be consistent with the underlying medical diagnosis rendered when the individual received initial services and care.”   This new requirement means that if you do not receive medical treatment for your injuries within two weeks after an incident, by any of the providers listed above, you could be precluded from receiving any PIP benefits.  Therefore, it is imperative that if you are injured in an automobile accident that you receive medical treatment within the 14 day time frame.  

2) In order to receive the full $10,000 PIP of benefits, you must have an "Emergency Medical Condition"   As the Florida legislature’s bill summary states, “the bill applies two different coverage limits for PIP medical benefits, based upon the severity of the medical condition of the individual. An individual may receive up to $10,000 in medical benefits for services and care if a physician, osteopathic physician, dentist, physician’s assistant or advanced registered nurse practitioner has determined that the injured person had an ‘emergency medical condition.’" Chiropractors cannot make this determination.   An "emergency medical condition" is defined as a “medical condition manifesting itself by acute symptoms of sufficient severity that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result in serious jeopardy to patient health, serious impairment to bodily functions, or serious dysfunction of a body organ or part.”  If an individual is not diagnosed with an emergency medical condition, the PIP medical benefit limit is only $2,500.   This “emergency medical condition” designation is obviously a subjective term, which could mean the difference between an injured person receiving $10,000 in medical benefits or only $2,500 for medical treatment.

3) Massage and Acupuncture are not covered by PIP Despite the palliative and pain relieving benefits of massage and acupuncture, these treatments are no longer covered or reimbursable by PIP, regardless of the type of provider rendering such services.   

4)  Your insurance company can force you to give an "Examination Under Oath" (EUO) and undergo a medical examination or you could lose your PIP benefits Insurers are authorized to take an examination under oath (EUO) of an insured. Compliance is a condition precedent for receiving benefits (which means that the insurer owes zero benefits if the insured does not comply).

The bill also provides that if a person unreasonably fails to appear for an independent medical examination (IME), the carrier is no longer responsible for benefits.  An IME is an examination undertaken and paid for by the insurance company's physician, not the insured's treating physician. The purpose of an IME is not to render treatment to the insured, but rather to determine if the insured is injured and, if so, if the treatment he or she has received was reasonable and necessary.  Although called an "Independent Medical Examination," the doctors who perform IMEs are chosen and paid for by the insurance companies, not the patient/insured.  Refusal or failure to appear for two IMEs raises a rebuttable presumption that the refusal or failure was unreasonable and thus PIP treatment could cease.

Given the new limitations, requirements and time restrictions of the PIP statute, it is more important than ever to be vigilant and proactive after an automobile accident, in order to protect your right to receive medical benefits available under your PIP insurance policy. For more information on the PIP law or any legal issue, please contact any of our attorneys.  This article is not a complete analysis of the PIP statutes, nor does it constitute legal advice. 

To view the new PIP law in its entirety, visit the Florida Senate's website at http://flsenate.gov/Committees/BillSummaries/2012/html/215  and http://flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2012/119

When it Comes to a Child’s Booster Seat, Proper Fit is Key, According to New Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Rankings

When it Comes to a Child’s Booster Seat, Proper Fit is Key, According to New Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Rankings

By: Dean Xenick (December 2011)

This past October, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) issued its newest ratings for children's booster seats with the goal of providing parents (and caregivers alike) with valuable information on how to select the right booster seats for their children. The IIHS went so far as specifically identifying those booster seats which are most likely to provide good lap and shoulder belt fit in a range of vehicles.

The IIHS article stated, "Unlike child restraints with built-in harnesses, a booster seat relies on a vehicle safety belt to buckle the child in. Its purpose is to make the adult belt fit the child better. Booster seats are for kids who have outgrown their forward-facing restraints."

Because traditional vehicle safety belts are designed with adults in mind, and not children or their booster seats, a proper fit between the booster seat, seat belt, and child is imperative to ensure proper restraint in the event of a collision. "When a booster seat is doing its job, the vehicle belt will fit a child correctly,” the article said. “That means the lap belt will lie flat across a child's upper thighs, not across the soft abdomen, and the shoulder belt will cross snugly over the middle of a child's shoulder."

In conducting their testing and issuing the results, the IIHS assessed the booster seats “using a special crash test dummy representing an average-size 6 year-old. Engineers measure how 3-point lap and shoulder belts fit the dummy in each of the tested boosters under 4 conditions that span the range of safety belt configurations in vehicle models. An overall rating for each booster is then assigned based on the range of scores for the lap and shoulder belt measurements." 

The IIHS assigned the booster seats a rating, based upon four categories:

BEST BETS: Seats that provide a good fit for typical 4 to 8 year-olds in almost any car, minivan, or SUV.
GOOD BETS: Seats that provide an acceptable fit in most cars, minivans, or SUVs.
NOT RECOMMENDED: Those seats that don’t provide a good fit and should be avoided.
CHECK FIT: Booster seats the Institute has tested but have varied results depending on child size, vehicle model.

The article also provided guidelines for proper booster seat fit, stating that "both the lap and shoulder belts must fit your child correctly.”

The lap belt should lie flat and on top of the thighs, not higher up on the abdomen. While the shoulder belt should fit across the middle of the child's shoulder. If it falls off the shoulder or rests on the neck, it won't work as well. An improper fit could also encourage your child to move the belt to a dangerous position, such as behind the back or under the arm.

At BCLC, we urge our family, friends, colleagues and clients to take the IIHS’s advice and safety rankings to heart, check how the booster seat you are currently using ranks, and make sure that you are buckling up your children correctly. 
For more information, visit: http://www.iihs.org/research/topics/boosters/default.html

NOTE: All of the information contained in this article was obtained from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, who is solely responsible for its testing and findings.

New Risks Associated with Portable and Inflatable Pools (from Yahoo Health, Licensed from Health Day News)

New Risks Associated with Portable and Inflatable Pools (from Yahoo Health, Licensed from Health Day News)

Burman, Critton, Luttier and Coleman LLP Blog

By Dean Xenick

Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio recently released a new study which reveals that portable swimming pools, including the increasingly popular, inflatable models, pose serious risks to young children. Researchers studied the drowning deaths of more than 200 children under 12 years old, and found a link to a variety of above-ground pools, some large and deep, others small and shallow. The report, published in the June 20 online edition of Pediatrics, highlights the need for safety precautions around all pools, safety advocates said.

According to lead researcher Dr. Gary A. Smith, director of the hospital's Center for Injury Research and Policy, "About every five days a child drowns in a portable pool in the U.S.," and because these pools are inexpensive and easy to assemble, many parents may not consider them as big a risk as in-ground pools, he said. The greatest risks are for children younger than 5 years, the researchers found.

Safe Kids USA is a nationwide network of organizations working to prevent unintentional childhood injury, the leading cause of death and disability for children ages 1 to 14. Safe Kids USA educates families, provide safety devices to families in need and advocates for better laws to help keep children safe, healthy and out of the emergency room. According to Safe Kids USA President, Meri-K Appy, "Safe Kids has been concerned about the increasing use of backyard pools that are too small for consumers to consider investing in fencing but too large to make them easy to empty and secure safely after each use. This important study confirms our speculation that portable pools in backyards across America pose special risks to young children."

In the Nationwide Children's Hospital study, using 2001-2009 data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Smith's team of researchers identified 209 drowning deaths and 35 near-drownings in children under 12. The team discovered that 94 percent of the children were under 5 and most (56 percent) were boys. Further, about three-quarters of the deaths took place in the child's own yard, usually during the summer. Over 40 percent of the drownings happened while the child was being supervised; 39 percent occurred with no adult supervision; and 18 percent were blamed on a lapse of supervision. The study also concluded that about 40 percent of the drownings took place in a shallow wading pool.

"That's in 18 inches or less of water," Smith said. "Children can drown in very small amounts of water. Very young children can drown in a five-gallon bucket with water in the bottom. It only takes a couple of inches and a few minutes. Close supervision of young children around water is really important, but supervision alone isn't enough," he continued.

While in-ground pools have a variety of safety measures available for parents to purchase, such as fencing and pool alarms, this is not the case for portable pools. Thus, in their study, Smith and his researchers make a call for industry development of reliable pool alarms, covers, and affordable fencing for portable pools. "We have to come up with other strategies that are affordable and effective for portable pools."

The study also raises concerns about pool ladders. "Most of the kids got into the pool using a ladder that was provided with the pool," Smith said. One suggestion is to remove the pool ladder when the pool is not in use and to store it out of reach of children.

Dr. Barbara Gaines, director of trauma and injury prevention at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, said that "this reminds us that while water is very inviting for children, it is also extremely hazardous. Never underestimate water."

Gaines' advises that parents need to be very watchful when their children are in and around water, including pools, ponds and bathtubs, to empty wading pools when not in use, it out when the pool is not in use, and parents must actively supervise their children  "Someone has to be on pool duty," at all times.

Lastly, Safe Kids USA promotes a pool-safety concept called "Lock, Look and Learn":

LOCK: Erect fencing at least 4 feet high with a self-latching gate and keep it locked at all times unless an adult is present.

LOOK: Parents and caregivers should watch children in or near the water at all times, and not socialize, read or sleep.

LEARN: "Adults should learn to swim themselves and provide swimming lessons to their children from an early age," Appy said. They should also know how to respond to an emergency — "use rescue equipment, call 911 and perform CPR," she added.

For more information: 

http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/hsn/portablepoolsposedrowningriskforyoungkids

http://www.safekids.org/

http://www.homesafetycouncil.org/index.asp

http://www.parentsareimportant.com/2011/06/summer-swim-safety.html

New Guidelines for Children’s Car Safety Seat Use

New Guidelines for Children’s Car Safety Seat Use

Burman, Critton, Luttier and Coleman LLP Blog

By Dean Xenick

Unfortunately, every year thousands of young children are killed or injured in car crashes. In fact, automobile accidents are the leading cause of death for children ages 4 and older. You can help keep your child safe by properly using car safety seats each and every time your child is transported in a vehicle.

On March 21, 2011 the American Academy of Pediatrics (“AAP”) released its updated car safety seat recommendations, which were published in the April 2011 issue of Pediatrics. The most significant change is that the AAP is now recommending that parents keep their toddlers in rear-facing car seats until age 2, or until they reach the maximum height and weight for their seat. The AAP also advises that most children will need to ride in a belt-positioning booster seat until they have reached 4 feet 9 inches tall and are between 8 and 12 years of age. Another recommendation is that children should ride in the rear of a vehicle until they are 13 years old.

These new recommendations differ from the AAP’s previous policy, released in 2002, which recommended that it was safest for infants and toddlers to ride rear-facing up to the limits of the car seat, citing age 12 months and 20 pounds as a minimum. As a result, many parents turned the seat to face the front of the car when their child turned one year old.

As the March 21, 2011 AAP release states:

“Parents often look forward to transitioning from one stage to the next, but these transitions should generally be delayed until they’re necessary, when the child fully outgrows the limits for his or her current stage,” said Dennis Durbin, MD, FAAP, lead author of the policy statement and accompanying technical report.

“A rear-facing child safety seat does a better job of supporting the head, neck and spine of infants and toddlers in a crash, because it distributes the force of the collision over the entire body,” Dr. Durbin said. “For larger children, a forward-facing seat with a harness is safer than a booster, and a belt-positioning booster seat provides better protection than a seat belt alone until the seat belt fits correctly.”

While the rate of deaths in motor vehicle crashes in children under age 16 has decreased substantially – dropping 45 percent between 1997 and 2009 – it is still the leading cause of death for children ages 4 and older. Counting children and teens up to age 21, there are more than 5,000 deaths each year. Fatalities are just the tip of the iceberg; for every fatality, roughly 18 children are hospitalized and more than 400 are injured seriously enough to require medical treatment.

New research has found children are safer in rear-facing car seats. A 2007 study in the journal Injury Prevention showed that children under age 2 are 75 percent less likely to die or be severely injured in a crash if they are riding rear-facing.

“The ‘age 2’ recommendation is not a deadline, but rather a guideline to help parents decide when to make the transition,” Dr. Durbin said. “Smaller children will benefit from remaining rear-facing longer, while other children may reach the maximum height or weight before 2 years of age.”

Children should transition from a rear-facing seat to a forward-facing seat with a harness, until they reach the maximum weight or height for that seat. Then a booster will make sure the vehicle’s lap-and-shoulder belt fit properly. The shoulder belt should lie across the middle of the chest and shoulder, not near the neck or face. The lap belt should fit low and snug on the hips and upper thighs, not across the belly. Most children will need a booster seat until they have reached 4 feet 9 inches tall and are between 8 and 12 years old.

Children should ride in the rear of a vehicle until they are 13 years old.

Although the Federal Aviation Administration permits children under age 2 to ride on an adult’s lap on an airplane, they are best protected by riding in an age- and size-appropriate restraint.

“Children should ride properly restrained on every trip in every type of transportation, on the road or in the air,” Dr. Durbin said.

Buckling up your child is the easy part. However, choosing the right seat for your child can be a daunting task, especially with so many different car safety seats on the market today.

The type of car safety seat your child needs depends on several factors, including your child’s size and the type of vehicle you have. The following information from the AAP offers guidance on choosing the most appropriate car safety seat for your child.

Here is an abbreviated list of the AAP’s recommendations regarding car safety seats, taken from the APP website, www.healthychildren.org.

Infants and toddlers—rear-facing

The AAP recommends that all infants should ride rear-facing starting with their first ride home from the hospital. All infants and toddlers should ride in a Rear-Facing Car Safety Seat until they are 2 years of age or until they reach the highest weight or height allowed by their car safety seat’s manufacturer.

Types of rear-facing car safety seats

There are 3 types of rear-facing car safety seats: infant-only seats, convertible seats, and 3-in-1 seats. When children reach the highest weight or length allowed by the manufacturer of their infant-only seat, they should continue to ride rear-facing in a convertible seat or 3-in-1 seat.

Toddlers and preschoolers—forward-facing

All children 2 years or older, or those younger than 2 years who have outgrown the rear-facing weight or height limit for their car safety seat, should use a Forward-Facing Car Safety Seat with a harness for as long as possible, up to the highest weight or height allowed by their car safety seat’s manufacturer. It is best for children to ride in a seat with a harness as long as possible, at least to 4 years of age. If your child outgrows his/her seat before reaching 4 years of age, consider using a seat with a harness approved for higher weights and heights.

School-aged children—booster seats

Booster seats are for older children who have outgrown their forward-facing car safety seats. All children whose weight or height is above the forward-facing limit for their car safety seat should use a Belt-Positioning Booster Seat until the vehicle seat belt fits properly, typically when they have reached 4 feet 9 inches in height and are between 8 and 12 years of age. The owner’s manual that comes with your car safety seat will tell you the height and weight limits for the seat. As a general guideline, a child has outgrown his forward-facing seat when any one of the following is true:

  • He/She reaches the top weight or height allowed for his/her seat with a harness. (These limits are listed on the seat and also included in the instruction booklet.)
  • His/Her shoulders are above the top harness slots.
  • His/Her ears have reached the top of the seat.

For more information on this topic, including all of the AAP’s recommendations for how to shop for, install, and use child car safety seats, visit the HealthyChildren.org website by following this link: http://www.healthychildren.org

You can also view the AAP’s March 21, 2011 News Release with the updated guidelines here: http://www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/carseat2011.htm.

At Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, making a difference and keeping our communities and children safe is very important to us. If you have questions regarding child safety seats or defective products, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Tips To Being An Effective Juror

Tips To Being An Effective Juror

Burman, Critton, Luttier and Coleman LLP Blog

By Dean Xenick

Jury duty is an extremely important civic duty, as juries are essential for our court system to work effectively. If one knows what to expect and understands the great importance of jury duty, participating in the greatest court system in the world can become a rewarding experience.

Know what Judges and Attorneys expect from Jurors

Judges and attorneys have the utmost respect for jurors and the vital role they play in our court system. We know that you take time out of your busy lives to perform this essential role in justice. In order for the system to work effectively, jurors, attorneys, and judges must work together to administer justice. Thus, an effective juror must: (1) Be honest, forthcoming, and genuine; (2) Listen attentively and take good notes; (3) Ask questions if you do not understand; and (4) Listen to all the evidence prior to forming any conclusions about the case. Of course, these are general guidelines and you should always follow the rules of your specific jurisdiction, which will be explained to you by the judges and attorneys in your specific case.

Be honest, forthcoming, and genuine

I cannot stress enough how important it is to be honest and forthcoming with the judges and attorneys while performing jury duty. During Voir Dire (jury selection) you will be asked a series of questions by the attorneys and judge. Always answer honestly and disclose full answers to these questions. Failure to do so could cause a mistrial or appeal after the case has concluded. If you have a sensitive issue to discuss, ask the judge to speak privately about it, instead of sharing with the rest of the jury pool. The questions posed by the lawyers are not meant to embarrass or harass, they are asked to discover your thoughts on certain topics. Lastly, be genuine; don't try to give answers you think the attorneys or judge wants. There is no "right answer," other than what your true, honest feeling is. If you stay true to who are and give honest answers to the questions posed to you, you will do fine.

Listen attentively and take good notes

It is essential to listen to all of the evidence presented and take good notes (if allowed by the judge). Just like if you miss an important scene of a good movie, if you lose focus during essential testimony in a trial, it could completely change your take on the case. Get a good night's rest each night, so that you can listen to all of the evidence presented and don't fall asleep! If the judge allows it, take notes throughout the trial. We attorneys have countless notes that we use in preparation for and during trial, so we can't expect you to digest a 4 or 5 day trial without taking notes. Some jurisdictions also allow juror questions. If that is the case, write your questions down so you don't forget to ask.

Ask questions if you do not understand

There is no shame in asking questions. Sometimes as lawyers we get so caught up in our case that we fail to properly explain legal concepts or specific facts. If you are unsure about something, ask the judge, don't guess. As stated above, some jurisdictions allow juror questions to attorneys about the specific facts and evidence presented. Don't be afraid to use this opportunity to have testimony or evidence clarified, if you do not understand something. As attorneys, we want you to have a full understanding of the facts and evidence presented, as well as the law. So if you don't understand something, ask.

Listen to all the evidence prior to forming any conclusions about the case

In a mystery novel, at the beginning you may think one person "did it," but in the end, it is usually the person you never expected. Thus, until you get all of the information in your possession, you cannot make an informed decision. Similarly in a trial, your thoughts at the beginning of a case may make you feel one way, while at the end you may have different thoughts. Therefore, do not make any conclusions about the case until you begin your deliberations. During deliberations you can take all of the evidence together and make an informed decision. In a criminal trial, the prosecution goes first, and then the Defendant, while in a civil trial the Plaintiff goes first, again followed by the Defendant. If you have made up your mind by the end of the Prosecution/Plaintiff's case, then the Defendant is prejudiced since you have decided the case before they can present their evidence and testimony. So, listen to all of the evidence presented and do not form opinions until deliberations.

Texting While Driving: More Dangerous Than DUI?

Texting While Driving: More Dangerous Than DUI?

Burman, Critton, Luttier and Coleman LLP Blog

By: Dean Xenick, Esq.

Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman encourages you to participate in the American Automobile Association (AAA), the Department of Transportation, and Seventeen magazine’s “Two-Second Turnoff Day” by taking two seconds to turn ioff your cell phone before driving. It could save a life.

It is common knowledge that drinking and driving is one of the most dangerous activities undertaken with a motor vehicle and should never be attempted; however, new studies are now suggesting that texting while driving could be even more dangerous than driving while under the influence of alcohol. 

In the August 2, 2010, edition of Seventeen magazine, “texting while driving is among the riskiest of common driving distractions. According to AAA, taking your eyes off of the road for two seconds doubles your risk of getting into a crash. Nearly 6,000 people died in 2008 in crashes involving a distracted or inattentive driver and more than a half million were injured, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.” 

Unfortunately, texting is on the rise, up from 9.8 billion messages a month in December 2005 to 110.4 billion in December 2008. And even though 84 percent of teen drivers know it’s dangerous, almost nine in 10 teenage drivers (86 percent) have driven while distracted.

Car and Driver magazine, in an effort to show the real world consequences of texting while driving, pitted texting while driving against drinking and driving in an “unofficial” test on a private, closed airport runway. First, a baseline reading of reaction time was taken, by mounting a light to the windshield of a test vehicle at eye level, meant to simulate a lead car’s brake lights. When the red light on the windshield lit up, the driver was instructed to hit the brakes.

First, they tested both drivers’ reaction times at 35 mph and 70 mph, while sober and without any distractions, to get the baseline readings. This procedure was repeated while the drivers read a text message on their phone aloud, which was then followed by a trial with the drivers typing the same message they had just received. All drivers were told to use their phones exactly as they would on a public road.

Once the baseline and texting tests were done, the test drivers then got out of the vehicle and drank beverages containing three ounces of alcohol. After each drink, the drivers blew into a breath-alcohol analyzer until they reached the impaired drunk driving limit of 0.08 percent blood-alcohol content. They then repeated the red light brake test without any texting distraction. The results showed that texting while driving resulted in worse driver reaction times than drunk driving. In some of the worst cases in the test, the amount of roadway needed to stop the vehicle while texting was up to 10 times longer, more than while impaired. For example, if while intoxicated it took a subject vehicle 31 feet to come to a stop, that number increased to 319 ft. while writing a text message.  Those are staggering numbers.

Since both texting and intoxication led to longer stopping distances, the folks at Car and Driver say, “the key element to driving safely is keeping your eyes and your mind on the road. Text messaging distracts any driver from that primary task. So the next time you’re tempted to text, tweet, e-mail, or otherwise type while driving, either ignore the urge or pull over.” 

Therefore, on September 17th, Seventeen magazine, AAA and the Department of Transportation are asking everyone to save a life and participate in the “Seventeen Two-Second Turnoff Day by taking two seconds to turn off their cell phone before driving. Instead of spending two seconds looking away from the road while driving distracted, use those two seconds to turn off your phone before you get behind the wheel.” Better yet, start this practice the next time you get into your vehicle. And, as always, never drink and drive.